The Arab Spring — about one year later

I was watching my favorite political television show this week, Fareed Zakaria’s “GPS,” and was surprised to hear Dr. Zakaria suggest that no one could have predicted the near universal disappointment with the way things have gone in the Middle East one year after the Arab Spring of early 2011 (I can’t find his exact quotation — but it was along those lines).  I wasn’t writing this blog at that point, but I certainly felt like the honeymoon wouldn’t last and that the excitement of revolution would give way to frustration with new leadership that would inevitably disappoint some segments of society.

Such disappointment happens after almost every revolution.  1990, the year after the wall fell, was a disappointing year for most East Europeans as their economies sunk into depression, and 1992 was equally trying for former citizens of the Soviet Union.  Even going back to the early history of the United States, the years 1783 to 1789, between our own revolution and the implementation of the Constitution, witnessed widespread turmoil and economic difficulties.  I’m sure a lot of new Americans during that period yearned to be British again.

Should we feel disappointed with what has transpired in the Arab world?  I don’t think so.  First, various populations have had different experiences, with reform in Morocco and Jordan, tenuous stability in Egypt and Libya, mass killings by leaders in Syria, slow motion revolution in Yemen, and a relatively smooth transition in Tunisia.  There was no one-size-fits-all revolution, and some populations have fared better than others.

The larger trend for the region is that new governments will be less secular and will introduce more laws intended to shore up their “Islamic” credentials.  These laws will be mostly symbolic, but some might disadvantage women, minorities, and other vulnerable groups in society.  While we might find this distasteful as Americans, it is of no more concern to us then Newt Gingrich’s pledge this week to overturn all of the U.S. government’s “anti-religious policies” should be to an Egyptian.

The movement towards democracy in the region has actually revealed how little support there is for Taliban, or even Iranian or Saudi-style theocratic Sharia law.  While many were surprised when the fundamentalist Egyptian al-Nour party garnered one quarter of the vote in that country’s parliamentary elections, that seemed like a glass half-empty attitude to me.  With only one-quarter of the population supporting strict Sharia law, the Egyptian people voiced their support for moderation over extremism.  The same occurred in Tunisia and is likely to occur in Libya when elections are held.

Outside of the region, the biggest winner is the United States.  Our biggest enemy in the world remains would-be Islamist terrorists, and the Arab Spring did more to undercut their cause then a decade of our “war on terrorism.”  Imagine that you were an Egyptian radical who has been taught that the United States is the mortal “far enemy” that would fight to the end to make sure that Islam remained suppressed under corrupt, autocratic rule.   All of a sudden, that view is turned upside down as the U.S. reaches out to governments elected by the people of the country.  Maybe you are still bitter about the past, maybe you still hate the United States for its support of Israel, but if you want to see Sharia law implemented in your country, there is a political party that you can work for in an attempt to make it happen peacefully.

The biggest danger to the region is not Islam, but rather a prickly sort of post-revolutionary nationalism.  In Egypt in particular, U.S. diplomacy needs to tread lightly and go out-of-the-way to show respect to the leaders that emerge in that country so long as the basic contours of democratic governance are maintained.

Any perceived interference in the affairs of any of the post-revolutionary governments in the area will be counterproductive.  A year after the revolutions began, we should be happy that things are moving in the right direction in the region, take advantage of the opportunity to redefine our relations with the peoples of the Arab World, and make sure that we convey the message that, even if most Americans value the separation of church and state, the idea of Islamic-based democracy is just fine with us.

Posted on February 4, 2012, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. Thanks for this. It puts a messy jumble of changes and upheaval happening in those complicated countries in context for someone who doesn’t keep up with such things as much as he should. And, perhaps more importantly, your summary take on it strikes a note of informed optimism — and emphasizes the need for patience — that I think is sorely lacking in much of the mainstream coverage of the revolutions and their longview prospects.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: